Quality Management Process - Revision history

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez at 09:36, 13 June 2025

2025-06-13T09:36:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 13 June 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	* Perform Quality Control		* Perform Quality Control

	== ~~5.1~~ Quality characteristics ==		== Quality characteristics ==
	The purpose of this step is to identify requirements, specifications, or guidelines that can be used to ensure that products, processes, or services are fit for achieving the desired outcome. These are documented in the present Management Guide and in the Quality Assurance policy.		The purpose of this step is to identify requirements, specifications, or guidelines that can be used to ensure that products, processes, or services are fit for achieving the desired outcome. These are documented in the present Management Guide and in the Quality Assurance policy.
	The project defines several quality characteristics to guide its implementation:		The project defines several quality characteristics to guide its implementation:
Line 23:		Line 23:
	* to assess the success of the project and to identify any areas for improvement.		* to assess the success of the project and to identify any areas for improvement.

	== ~~5.2~~ Quality Assurance ==		== Quality Assurance ==
	Quality assurance in UNITA is a proactive, ongoing process that focuses on preventing quality issues. Key aspects include:		Quality assurance in UNITA is a proactive, ongoing process that focuses on preventing quality issues. Key aspects include:
	* Establishing quality standards and procedures aligned with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG)		* Establishing quality standards and procedures aligned with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG)
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* Satisfaction Barometer.		* Satisfaction Barometer.

	== ~~5.3~~ Quality Control ==		== Quality Control ==
	Quality Control is a reactive process that identifies and addresses quality issues after they occur. In UNITA, QC activities include:		Quality Control is a reactive process that identifies and addresses quality issues after they occur. In UNITA, QC activities include:
	* Evaluating joint programs and courses against established quality criteria		* Evaluating joint programs and courses against established quality criteria

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Deliverable Quality Review Process */

2025-05-13T14:57:05Z

Deliverable Quality Review Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 13 May 2025
Line 140:		Line 140:
	* '''Peer review''': a process in which team members review and evaluate each other's work. It can help to identify any errors or omissions, and assure consistency and high standard for the deliverables, providing feedback to the Task Team members.		* '''Peer review''': a process in which team members review and evaluate each other's work. It can help to identify any errors or omissions, and assure consistency and high standard for the deliverables, providing feedback to the Task Team members.

	In this Project, the Peer Review is processed individually. Three (3) Reviewers will be selected, outside of the QEB and the Task Team/Work Package from where the Deliverable Report is from. Of these 3 reviewers, only 1 or 2 (depending on the Deliverable) will carry out the assessment, living the rest in reserve, in the event of unforeseen circumstances.		In this Project, the Peer Review is processed individually. Three (3) Reviewers will be selected, outside of the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Task Team/Work Package from where the Deliverable Report is from. Of these 3 reviewers, only 1 or 2 (depending on the Deliverable) will carry out the assessment, living the rest in reserve, in the event of unforeseen circumstances.

	This Deliverable Quality Review, is also used as information to the QRC, for the Project Quality Report.		This Deliverable Quality Review, is also used as information to the QRC, for the Project Quality Report.
	==== Deliverable Review Process ====		==== Deliverable Review Process ====
	* '''''Step 1''''': At least, 15 days before the deadline, described in the Grant Agreement, is allocated time for the WPL, to send the Deliverable drafting to Quality Review, to the Peers.		* '''''Step 1''''': At least, 15 days before the deadline, described in the Grant Agreement, is allocated time for the [[WP Co-Leaders\|WPL]], to send the Deliverable drafting to Quality Review, to the Peers.
	* '''''Step 2''''': The Quality Review should be done in one (1) week and sent to the WPL, as for the Report's author can have time to collect the comments/suggestions from the Peer Reviewers and decide what changes/actions to the document are to be undertaken.		* '''''Step 2''''': The Quality Review should be done in one (1) week and sent to the [[WP Co-Leaders\|WPL]], as for the Report's author can have time to collect the comments/suggestions from the Peer Reviewers and decide what changes/actions to the document are to be undertaken.

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Project Quality Review Process */

2025-05-13T14:47:56Z

Project Quality Review Process

@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 | I || Informed
 |}
-==== Quality Review Process ====
+=== Deliverable Quality Review Process ===

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities */

2025-05-13T14:42:32Z

Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 13 May 2025
Line 118:		Line 118:
	\| R \|\| S \|\| S \|\| C \|\| A \|\| C		\| R \|\| S \|\| S \|\| C \|\| A \|\| C
	\|}		\|}
			==== Consolidated Responsibilities Assignment Matrix (RAM/RASCI) ====
			{\| class="wikitable"
			! RASCI !! Description
			\|-
			\| R \|\| Responsible
			\|-
			\| A \|\| Accountable
			\|-
			\| S \|\| Supports
			\|-
			\| C \|\| Consulted
			\|-
			\| I \|\| Informed
			\|}
			==== Quality Review Process ====

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities */

2025-05-13T14:41:27Z

Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 |-
 | Governance Board ([[Governance Board|GB]]) || Is consulted by the [[Management Committee|MC]] and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.
 |}

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities */

2025-05-13T14:37:06Z

Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 13 May 2025
Line 105:		Line 105:
	\| Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) \|\| Is informed of the Quality Review Report and approves the Quality recommendations.		\| Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) \|\| Is informed of the Quality Review Report and approves the Quality recommendations.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Governance Board ([[Governance Board\|GB]]) \|\| Is consulted by the MC and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.		\| Governance Board ([[Governance Board\|GB]]) \|\| Is consulted by the [[Management Committee\|MC]] and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.
	\|}		\|}

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities */

2025-05-13T14:36:42Z

Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 13 May 2025
Line 91:		Line 91:
	! Main Roles !! Responsibilities		! Main Roles !! Responsibilities
	\|-		\|-
	\| Task Team 1.3 (~~TT1~~.3) \|\| Responsible for the kick-off evaluation, monitor and support the process evolution, provide information in some domains of the Quality Review Checklist (QRC), collect and merge the contributions of other members - surveys results - , prepare the latest version of the QRC, propose recommendations and prepare the Report.		\| Task Team 1.3 ([[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT3.1]]) \|\| Responsible for the kick-off evaluation, monitor and support the process evolution, provide information in some domains of the Quality Review Checklist (QRC), collect and merge the contributions of other members - surveys results - , prepare the latest version of the QRC, propose recommendations and prepare the Report.
	\|-		\|-
	\| WP Co- Leaders (WPL) & Task Co- Leader (TL) \|\| Provide information to the ~~U_EC~~, and answer several questions in the QRC Domains.		\| WP Co- Leaders ([[WP Co-Leaders\|WPL]]) & Task Co- Leader ([[Task_Team_Co-Leaders\|TTL]]) \|\| Provide information to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and answer several questions in the QRC Domains.
	\|-		\|-
	\| UNITA Offices (UO) \|\| Provide information related to costs and human resources.		\| UNITA Offices ([[UNITA Offices\|UO]]) \|\| Provide information related to costs and human resources.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Task Team Members (TT), Governance Stakeholders (GS) and Beneficiaries \|\| These UNITA members will provide information, throughout surveys, that will allow to answer questions related to satisfaction and documentation knowledge.		\| Task Team Members ([[Task Team Members\|TT]]), Governance Stakeholders (GS) and Beneficiaries \|\| These UNITA members will provide information, throughout surveys, that will allow to answer questions related to satisfaction and documentation knowledge.
	\|-		\|-
	\| UNITA Executive Coordinator (~~U_EC~~) \|\| Fill in the answer to some questions in the various QRC domains and, approve the latest version of the QRC and of the Report, before they are sent to the QEB. Also identifies the responsibles and deadlines for the actions, to comply with the Quality recommendations, and support their implementation.		\| UNITA Executive Coordinator ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]) \|\| Fill in the answer to some questions in the various QRC domains and, approve the latest version of the QRC and of the Report, before they are sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]]. Also identifies the responsibles and deadlines for the actions, to comply with the Quality recommendations, and support their implementation.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Quality & Evaluation Board (QEB) \|\| Review and makes the final approval of the Report. Suggests more recommendations if needed.		\| Quality & Evaluation Board ([[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]]) \|\| Review and makes the final approval of the Report. Suggests more recommendations if needed.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Management Committee (MC) \|\| Is informed of the Quality Review Report and approves the Quality recommendations.		\| Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) \|\| Is informed of the Quality Review Report and approves the Quality recommendations.
	\|-		\|-
	\| Governance Board (GB) \|\| Is consulted by the MC and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.		\| Governance Board ([[Governance Board\|GB]]) \|\| Is consulted by the MC and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.
	\|}		\|}

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez at 14:32, 13 May 2025

2025-05-13T14:32:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 13 May 2025
Line 86:		Line 86:

	All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].		All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].

			==== Quality Control Roles and Responsibilities ====
			{\| class="wikitable"
			! Main Roles !! Responsibilities
			\|-
			\| Task Team 1.3 (TT1.3) \|\| Responsible for the kick-off evaluation, monitor and support the process evolution, provide information in some domains of the Quality Review Checklist (QRC), collect and merge the contributions of other members - surveys results - , prepare the latest version of the QRC, propose recommendations and prepare the Report.
			\|-
			\| WP Co- Leaders (WPL) & Task Co- Leader (TL) \|\| Provide information to the U_EC, and answer several questions in the QRC Domains.
			\|-
			\| UNITA Offices (UO) \|\| Provide information related to costs and human resources.
			\|-
			\| Task Team Members (TT), Governance Stakeholders (GS) and Beneficiaries \|\| These UNITA members will provide information, throughout surveys, that will allow to answer questions related to satisfaction and documentation knowledge.
			\|-
			\| UNITA Executive Coordinator (U_EC) \|\| Fill in the answer to some questions in the various QRC domains and, approve the latest version of the QRC and of the Report, before they are sent to the QEB. Also identifies the responsibles and deadlines for the actions, to comply with the Quality recommendations, and support their implementation.
			\|-
			\| Quality & Evaluation Board (QEB) \|\| Review and makes the final approval of the Report. Suggests more recommendations if needed.
			\|-
			\| Management Committee (MC) \|\| Is informed of the Quality Review Report and approves the Quality recommendations.
			\|-
			\| Governance Board (GB) \|\| Is consulted by the MC and is informed half-yearly in the Project Progress Report.
			\|}

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Review Process */

2025-05-13T14:16:58Z

Quality Review Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 May 2025
Line 80:		Line 80:
	Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.		Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.

	* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.		* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the '''QRC''' and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.
	* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.		* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.
	* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).		* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Quality Review Process */

2025-05-13T14:16:45Z

Quality Review Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 May 2025
Line 72:		Line 72:

	==== Quality Review Process ====		==== Quality Review Process ====
	* '''''Step 1''''': The process starts with a meeting between members from [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] and the UNITA Executive Coordinator ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]), in which the process and the role of the participants are explained and the Quality Review Checklist (QRC) is presented.		* '''''Step 1''''': The process starts with a meeting between members from [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] and the UNITA Executive Coordinator ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]), in which the process and the role of the participants are explained and the '''Quality Review Checklist (QRC)''' is presented.
	* '''''Step 2''''': After this meeting, two (2) processes will be running at the same time:		* '''''Step 2''''': After this meeting, two (2) processes will be running at the same time:
	1. The QRC will be sent to the ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]) to be used to assess the project's compliance with the planned activities (and related outputs) in several domains – Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Risk, Issues & Decisions, Communication, Project Organization, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Each question has the indication of who should be responsible for its answer and who/what should be consulted in order to obtain it; and		1. The '''QRC''' will be sent to the ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]) to be used to assess the project's compliance with the planned activities (and related outputs) in several domains – Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Risk, Issues & Decisions, Communication, Project Organization, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Each question has the indication of who should be responsible for its answer and who/what should be consulted in order to obtain it; and

	2. At the same time, Surveys created to assess the Satisfaction of the Governance Stakeholders and the Beneficiaries – Students, Teachers, Researchers and Academic Community – are sent to the respective target audience. The results from these Surveys are collected and analyzed by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]].		2. At the same time, Surveys created to assess the Satisfaction of the Governance Stakeholders and the Beneficiaries – Students, Teachers, Researchers and Academic Community – are sent to the respective target audience. The results from these Surveys are collected and analyzed by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]].

	Once the QRC is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.		Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.

	* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both QRC and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.		* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.
	* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the QRC, making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.		* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.
	* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).		* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).
	* '''''Step 6''''': To complete the process, the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) is in charge of the recommendations approval.		* '''''Step 6''''': To complete the process, the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) is in charge of the recommendations approval.

	All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].		All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 May 2025
Line 80:		Line 80:
	Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.		Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.

	* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.		* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the '''QRC''' and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.
	* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.		* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.
	* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).		* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 May 2025
Line 72:		Line 72:

	==== Quality Review Process ====		==== Quality Review Process ====
	* '''''Step 1''''': The process starts with a meeting between members from [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] and the UNITA Executive Coordinator ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]), in which the process and the role of the participants are explained and the Quality Review Checklist (QRC) is presented.		* '''''Step 1''''': The process starts with a meeting between members from [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] and the UNITA Executive Coordinator ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]), in which the process and the role of the participants are explained and the '''Quality Review Checklist (QRC)''' is presented.
	* '''''Step 2''''': After this meeting, two (2) processes will be running at the same time:		* '''''Step 2''''': After this meeting, two (2) processes will be running at the same time:
	1. The QRC will be sent to the ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]) to be used to assess the project's compliance with the planned activities (and related outputs) in several domains – Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Risk, Issues & Decisions, Communication, Project Organization, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Each question has the indication of who should be responsible for its answer and who/what should be consulted in order to obtain it; and		1. The '''QRC''' will be sent to the ([[Executive Coordinator\|EC]]) to be used to assess the project's compliance with the planned activities (and related outputs) in several domains – Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Risk, Issues & Decisions, Communication, Project Organization, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Each question has the indication of who should be responsible for its answer and who/what should be consulted in order to obtain it; and

	2. At the same time, Surveys created to assess the Satisfaction of the Governance Stakeholders and the Beneficiaries – Students, Teachers, Researchers and Academic Community – are sent to the respective target audience. The results from these Surveys are collected and analyzed by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]].		2. At the same time, Surveys created to assess the Satisfaction of the Governance Stakeholders and the Beneficiaries – Students, Teachers, Researchers and Academic Community – are sent to the respective target audience. The results from these Surveys are collected and analyzed by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]].

	Once the QRC is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.		Once the '''QRC''' is completed by the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], he sends it to the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], so that the results from the Surveys can be added to the Stakeholder Satisfaction’s Domain.

	* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both QRC and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.		* '''''Step 3''''': It is up to [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] to make the first analysis of the QRC and make a first Draft of the Quality Report. By email or through a meeting, [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]] shares the Draft with the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], so that questions/doubts/comments can be solved and added to the Report. After, a Final Draft is made by the [[UNITA_Quality_Assurance\|TT1.3]], of both '''QRC''' and the Report, with preliminary suggestions/recommendations to the findings, and sent to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] for approval.
	* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the QRC, making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.		* '''''Step 4''''': It is up to the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] to carry out the analysis of the Report and complete the "Recommendations" sheet in the '''QRC''', making any suggestions for improvement that it deems necessary.
	* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).		* '''''Step 5''''': Once approved, the Report is sent to the [[Executive Coordinator\|EC]], and it is up to him to identify the actions, with the responsibles and deadlines, needed to implement the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] recommendations and inform about them, both the [[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]] and the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]).
	* '''''Step 6''''': To complete the process, the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) is in charge of the recommendations approval.		* '''''Step 6''''': To complete the process, the Management Committee ([[Management Committee\|MC]]) is in charge of the recommendations approval.

	All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].		All documents for the quality control can be found [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/files/?dir=/2_Boards/Quality_and_Evaluation_Board/WG3_Quality_Review_Checklist&fileid=778550 here].