Quality and Evaluation Board - Revision history

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez at 09:04, 26 May 2025

2025-05-26T09:04:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 26 May 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Six QA experts from the partner institutions.		* Six QA experts from the partner institutions.
	* Two representatives of the [[Student_Assembly\|SA]].		* Two representatives of the [[Student_Assembly\|SA]].
			[[File:UNITA QEB.png\|thumb\|UNITA QEB Board Organizational Chart. ]]

	== Role ==		== Role ==

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Responsibilities */

2025-05-13T11:53:30Z

Responsibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 13 May 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== Responsibilities ==		== Responsibilities ==
	* ~~Define~~ and regularly ~~update guidelines~~ for UNITA’s QA, benchmarking ~~against~~ current guidelines in partner ~~universities~~.		* Defining and regularly updating Guidelines for UNITA’s QA, benchmarking the current guidelines in the partner Universities.
	* ~~Contribute~~ to shared documents defining project quality standards and monitoring rules~~; publish~~ an annual ~~self‐assessment~~ report on ~~good practices~~.		* Contributing to the shared documents defining project quality standards and monitoring rules, it publishes an annual self-assessment report on Good Practices which will be disseminated.
	* ~~Monitor~~ cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness ~~via a Quality Review Checklist~~, ~~tracking objective~~ achievement ~~against~~ time~~, cost~~, and ~~stakeholder~~ satisfaction~~; synthesize~~ findings in a biannual Quality Review Report.		* Monitoring through a Quality Review Checklist the project’s cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness, the achievement of objectives with their time and costs, and the stakeholders’ satisfaction, as expected within a QA framework. The findings and recommendations are synthetized in a biannual Quality Review Report.
	* Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members and sister Romance~~-language universities~~ in the EU and overseas.		* Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members of the Alliance and sister Romance languages Universities in the EU and overseas.

	[[Category:Roles]]		[[Category:Roles]]

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Role */

2025-05-13T11:50:25Z

Role

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 13 May 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Role ==		== Role ==
	The QEB monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the [[Governance Board\|GB]]. It is in charge of the UNITA and its constellation projects’ QA policy, processes and practices through self-assessment and evaluation involving students and external stakeholders. It ensures the implementation, transparency, and fulfillment of the project’s mission statement and long-term vision; carries out monitoring actions (including on indicators and budget); and identifies and shares good practices to pursue continuous improvement.		The '''QEB''' monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the [[Governance Board\|GB]]. It is in charge of the UNITA and its constellation projects’ QA policy, processes and practices through self-assessment and evaluation involving students and external stakeholders. It ensures the implementation, transparency, and fulfillment of the project’s mission statement and long-term vision; carries out monitoring actions (including on indicators and budget); and identifies and shares good practices to pursue continuous improvement.

	== Frequency ==		== Frequency ==

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Frequency */

2025-05-13T11:50:13Z

Frequency

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 13 May 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Frequency ==		== Frequency ==
	The QEB meets once every two months. At least once per semester, one meeting is held physically at the same location as the [[Governance Board#Frequency\|GB]] meeting, and one by videoconference.		The '''QEB''' meets once every two months. At least once per semester, one meeting is held physically at the same location as the [[Governance Board#Frequency\|GB]] meeting, and one by videoconference.

	== Responsibilities ==		== Responsibilities ==

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Members */

2025-05-13T11:49:53Z

Members

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 13 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Members ==		== Members ==
	The '''Quality and Evaluation Board (QEB)''' is composed of:		The '''Quality and Evaluation Board (QEB)''' is composed of:
	* One representative of the [[Participants#Associated_Partners\|AP]] ACPUA		* One representative of the [[Participants#Associated_Partners\|AP]] ACPUA.
	* Up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)		* Up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency).
	* Six QA experts from the partner institutions		* Six QA experts from the partner institutions.
	* Two representatives of the [[Student_Assembly\|SA]]		* Two representatives of the [[Student_Assembly\|SA]].

	== Role ==		== Role ==

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: /* Members */

2025-05-13T11:49:36Z

Members

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 13 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Members ==		== Members ==
	The '''Quality and Evaluation Board (QEB)''' is composed of:		The '''Quality and Evaluation Board (QEB)''' is composed of:
	* One representative of the [[~~Associated Partners~~\|AP]] [[ACPUA]]		* One representative of the [[Participants#Associated_Partners\|AP]] ACPUA
	* Up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)		* Up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)
	* Six QA experts from the partner institutions		* Six QA experts from the partner institutions

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez at 11:44, 13 May 2025

2025-05-13T11:44:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 13 May 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Members ==		== Members ==
	The ~~Quality and Evaluation Board (~~'''[[Quality and Evaluation Board\|QEB]]''') is composed of:		The '''Quality and Evaluation Board (QEB)''' is composed of:
	* ~~one~~ representative of the [[Associated Partners\|AP]] [[ACPUA]]		* One representative of the [[Associated Partners\|AP]] [[ACPUA]]
	* up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)		* Up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)
	* ~~six~~ QA experts from the partner institutions		* Six QA experts from the partner institutions
	* ~~two~~ representatives of the [[~~Students’ Assembly~~\|SA]]		* Two representatives of the [[Student_Assembly\|SA]]

	== Role ==		== Role ==
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* Monitor cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness via a Quality Review Checklist, tracking objective achievement against time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction; synthesize findings in a biannual Quality Review Report.		* Monitor cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness via a Quality Review Checklist, tracking objective achievement against time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction; synthesize findings in a biannual Quality Review Report.
	* Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members and sister Romance-language universities in the EU and overseas.		* Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members and sister Romance-language universities in the EU and overseas.

			[[Category:Roles]]

Antonio De Jesus Menchaca Martinez: Created page with "== Members == The Quality and Evaluation Board ('''QEB''') is composed of: * one representative of the AP ACPUA * up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency) * six QA experts from the partner institutions * two representatives of the SA == Role == The QEB monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the GB. It is in..."

2025-05-09T15:42:22Z

Created page with "== Members == The Quality and Evaluation Board ('''QEB''') is composed of: * one representative of the AP ACPUA * up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency) * six QA experts from the partner institutions * two representatives of the SA == Role == The QEB monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the GB. It is in..."

New page

== Members ==
The Quality and Evaluation Board ('''[[Quality and Evaluation Board|QEB]]''') is composed of:
* one representative of the [[Associated Partners|AP]] [[ACPUA]]
* up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency)
* six QA experts from the partner institutions
* two representatives of the [[Students’ Assembly|SA]]

== Role ==
The QEB monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the [[Governance Board|GB]]. It is in charge of the UNITA and its constellation projects’ QA policy, processes and practices through self-assessment and evaluation involving students and external stakeholders. It ensures the implementation, transparency, and fulfillment of the project’s mission statement and long-term vision; carries out monitoring actions (including on indicators and budget); and identifies and shares good practices to pursue continuous improvement.

== Frequency ==
The QEB meets once every two months. At least once per semester, one meeting is held physically at the same location as the [[Governance Board#Frequency|GB]] meeting, and one by videoconference.

== Responsibilities ==
* Define and regularly update guidelines for UNITA’s QA, benchmarking against current guidelines in partner universities.
* Contribute to shared documents defining project quality standards and monitoring rules; publish an annual self‐assessment report on good practices.
* Monitor cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness via a Quality Review Checklist, tracking objective achievement against time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction; synthesize findings in a biannual Quality Review Report.
* Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members and sister Romance-language universities in the EU and overseas.