Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
UNITApedia
Search
English
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main Page
User Guide
Viewpoints
Structural
Strategic
Beneficiary
Semantic
Infrastructure
Data
Beneficiaries
UNITA Participants
GEMINAE
Collectives
Agile Management Guide
Quality Management Process
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Page values
In other languages
Editing
UNITA Agile Management Guide
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Escalation Process of Decisions == === Managerial Decision-Making === The task team must work autonomously, but in constant coordination with the WP leaders and the Management Committee. Decisions on the development of tasks are taken within the task team. Questions that cannot be resolved by the task team are referred to the WP leaders for their arbitration. If arbitration is not possible and the question is of a managerial nature, the WP leaders will pass the question on to the MC. One of the roles of the WPL is to refer questions to the MC only as a last resort. They must first and foremost seek a resolution within the WP. When communicated to WPL or the MC, problems must be well defined and always include possible solutions. === Political Decision-Making === Due to the transformative potential of UNITA and the deep impact of its structures and activities on the alliance members, some of the decisions made within the TT must be validated by the Vice Rectors-Presidents Boards who will act as delegates of the Governance Board. This political approval not only affects certain decisions, but also some deliverables or milestones, as pointed out in the corresponding section. The WP co-leaders will handle the interaction with the [[VR/VP|VR/VP]] boards. * Following the work of the task team, a need for a decision with political impact arises, with several alternatives. * This decision is submitted to the [[WP Co-Leaders|WP co-leaders]] by the [[Task_Team_Co-Leaders|TTL]], providing the necessary context. * The [[WP Co-Leaders|WP co-leaders]] consult the [[VR/VP|VR/VP]] board assigned to the task, who make a decision either during a scheduled Steering Committee meeting (VR/VP board enlarged to WP and Task co-leaders) or asynchronously through a survey, in both cases arranged by the WP co-leaders. * The decision made by the [[VR/VP|VR/VP]] board is communicated to the [[Task_Team_Co-Leaders|TT co-leaders]], so that they can include it on the agenda for the next task meeting. * The decision is communicated to the [[Task Team Members|TT]], who resumes the work on the matter with a clear political guidance.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UNITApedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (public domain) (see
UNITApedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Debug data: