Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
UNITApedia
Search
English
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main Page
User Guide
Documentation
Viewpoints
Structural
Strategic
Beneficiary
Semantic
Infrastructure
Data
Beneficiaries
UNITA Participants
GEMINAE
Collectives
Agile Management Guide
Quality Management Process
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Page values
In other languages
Editing
UNITA Agile Management Guide
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Issues and mitigation measures == Risks and issues are different (source pmi.org): The key difference is an โissueโ already has occurred and a โriskโ is a potential issue that may or may not happen and can impact the project positively or negatively. We plan in advance and work out mitigation plans for high-impact risks. For all issues at hand, we need to act immediately to resolve them. '''Examples of issues that can arise in the project are:''' * There are disagreements on the interpretation of requirements; * The WP task force has difficulties achieving the set goals (e.g. in terms of time, resources or quality); * Non-conformities are identified by the WP task force or by other Stakeholders; * Risks identified in the Risk Log occur, and thus risks change from potential problems to actual problems; * External effects that influence the project in a negative way; * Many other reasons. === Issue management === Issue management aims to ensure that issues that have a potential impact on project scope, time, cost, quality, risk, or stakeholder satisfaction are assessed and acted upon. Issues are logged and followed-up in a Issue Log. In each TT meeting, the team must: * check and update the status (to do, in progress, done) of previousuly assigned issues * identify new issues (if any) and the affected area (Schedule, Budget, Resources, Quality, Reputation) * assess them in terms of priority * assign them (RASCI) for resolution by specific actions A priority level score is assigned according to the following list: {| class="wikitable" ! Level !! Meaning |- | Critical || Immediate action required |- | High || Significant impact, resolve soon |- | Medium || Important but not urgent |- | Low || Minor improvement or enhancement |} As the following diagram shows, issue management follows the escalation process of decisions previously defined in the guide.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UNITApedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (public domain) (see
UNITApedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Debug data: