Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
UNITApedia
Search
English
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main Page
User Guide
Viewpoints
Structural
Strategic
Beneficiary
Semantic
Infrastructure
Data
Beneficiaries
UNITA Participants
GEMINAE
Collectives
Agile Management Guide
Quality Management Process
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Page values
In other languages
Editing
UNITA Agile Management Guide
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Changes == Adopting the Agile perspective implies recognising and to welcoming the natural evolution of the project scope. As a project progresses, both the project team and the stakeholders gain a better understanding of the problems to be tackled and how to address them. UNITA 2 fully embraces this perspective, limiting the project planning to the activity level, and giving the TT's full freedom to develop these activities into specific actions. This way, all the benefits of incremental and iterative development, and of frequent feedback, will permeate through the project. The Agile methodology is also an excelent way to channel and profit from the enormous creativity and potential of a project team formed by hundreds of academics, students and staff. It may happen, however, that certain events require structural changes in the project, beyond the range of what can be tackled at the TT level with individual actions. These changes may arise as a consequence of, for example: * changes in scope, * new requirements, * identified issues or potential risks, * political decisions that affect the project baselines (scheduling, staffing or budget). This sort of changes must be discussed and approved at the MC level. Thus, when they are proposed by a Task Team, the TT co-leaders will commnicate them to the WP co-leaders, who will bring the proposal to the MC. If the decision has a strategic or political potential impact, the MC will also seek the approval of the GB.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UNITApedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (public domain) (see
UNITApedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Debug data: