Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
UNITApedia
Search
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Page values
In other languages
Editing
Quality and Evaluation Board
Page
Discussion
eng
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Members == The Quality and Evaluation Board ('''[[Quality and Evaluation Board|QEB]]''') is composed of: * one representative of the [[Associated Partners|AP]] [[ACPUA]] * up to five representatives of national QA agencies (one per agency) * six QA experts from the partner institutions * two representatives of the [[Students’ Assembly|SA]] == Role == The QEB monitors reports and policies and provides suggestions and feedback to the [[Governance Board|GB]]. It is in charge of the UNITA and its constellation projects’ QA policy, processes and practices through self-assessment and evaluation involving students and external stakeholders. It ensures the implementation, transparency, and fulfillment of the project’s mission statement and long-term vision; carries out monitoring actions (including on indicators and budget); and identifies and shares good practices to pursue continuous improvement. == Frequency == The QEB meets once every two months. At least once per semester, one meeting is held physically at the same location as the [[Governance Board#Frequency|GB]] meeting, and one by videoconference. == Responsibilities == * Define and regularly update guidelines for UNITA’s QA, benchmarking against current guidelines in partner universities. * Contribute to shared documents defining project quality standards and monitoring rules; publish an annual self‐assessment report on good practices. * Monitor cost-benefit assessment and effectiveness via a Quality Review Checklist, tracking objective achievement against time, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction; synthesize findings in a biannual Quality Review Report. * Provide a comprehensive analysis of UNITA’s modus operandi and summarize it in an overall Self-Assessment Report on Good Practices, published and disseminated at international higher-education conferences and among associated members and sister Romance-language universities in the EU and overseas.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to UNITApedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (domaine public) (see
UNITApedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)