These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission.
UNITA Quality Assurance: Difference between revisions
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Name={{PAGENAME}} | |Name={{PAGENAME}} | ||
|PartOf workpackage=Governance, management and quality | |PartOf workpackage=Governance, management and quality | ||
|Impact SA= | |Impact SA=Quality, Impact and Sustainability | ||
}} | }} | ||
= Objectives = | = Objectives = | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1473670?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FWP1_Gantt_Chart.xlsx GANTT – WP1 GANTT] | * [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1473670?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FWP1_Gantt_Chart.xlsx GANTT – WP1 GANTT] | ||
{ | {{#ask: [[-Has subobject::DataSrc:UNITA Data/Meta UNITA/Activities]] | ||
[[deliverable_id::3]] | |||
|?deliverable_number=List of activities | |||
|?activity_title | |||
|?activity_description | |||
|?deadline | |||
|class=datatable | |||
|format=datatables | |||
|mainlabel=- | |||
}} | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
= Indicators = | = Indicators = | ||
Line 59: | Line 48: | ||
* [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1547422?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP5%2FTask5.4%2FSubtask%205.4.1%2FList%20of%20indicators.pptx List of Indicators – UNITA indicators] | * [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1547422?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP5%2FTask5.4%2FSubtask%205.4.1%2FList%20of%20indicators.pptx List of Indicators – UNITA indicators] | ||
=== Secondary indicators | {{#tag:tabber | ||
| Primary indicators= | |||
These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission. | |||
{{#ask: | |||
[[-Has subobject::DataSrc:UNITA Data/Meta Indic/Indicators]] | |||
[[level::Primary]] | |||
[[task_title::{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||
|?indic_number=Indicator | |||
|?indic_description=Indicator Description | |||
|?baseline | |||
|?target | |||
|class=datatable | |||
|format=datatables | |||
|mainlabel=- | |||
}} | |||
{{!}}-{{!}} Secondary indicators= | |||
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader | To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader | ||
{{#ask: | |||
[[-Has subobject::DataSrc:UNITA Data/Meta Indic/Indicators]] | |||
[[level::Secondary]] | |||
[[task_title::{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||
|?indic_description=Indicator Description | |||
|?baseline | |||
|?target | |||
|class=datatable | |||
|format=datatables | |||
|mainlabel=- | |||
}} | |||
{{!}}-{{!}} Sub-Indicators= | |||
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader | |||
{{#ask: | |||
[[-Has subobject::DataSrc:UNITA Data/Meta Indic/Indicators]] | |||
[[level::Sub-Indicator]] | |||
[[task_title::{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||
|?indic_description=Sub-Indicator Description | |||
|?parent_indicator=Parent Indicator | |||
|class=datatable | |||
|format=datatables | |||
|mainlabel=- | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
=== Subtask Outputs === | === Subtask Outputs === | ||
Line 135: | Line 158: | ||
| 1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions? | | 1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions? | ||
| Partners of UNITA | | Partners of UNITA | ||
| <br /> | | <br />- Other universities the UNITA partners collaborate with (exchange students; visiting professors)<br /> | ||
- National accreditation agencies<br /> | |||
- European Commission<br /> | |||
- Other EU alliances<br /> | |||
- Enterprises (participating to events and conferences) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them? | | 2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them? | ||
| To be defined in interview | | To be defined in interview | ||
| Possible impact measures:<br /> | | Possible impact measures:<br /> | ||
- Conference proceedings<br /> | |||
- Research outputs<br /> | |||
- Consultancy for external entities (C/terzi) on QA | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 159: | Line 182: | ||
! style="background-color:#e6f2ff;" | '''Possible sub indicators''' | ! style="background-color:#e6f2ff;" | '''Possible sub indicators''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | '''IND 1.3.a''' Percentage of quality assessed UNITA Constellation projects | ||
| | | % (list of projects reviewed / total of Constellation projects active at least 6 months) | ||
| | | QEB Office: Quality Review Reports approved by the QEB (manual collection; reports available on the Datacloud) | ||
| | | Semestral or annual | ||
| | | 40% (UNITA, Re-UNITA) | ||
| | | 100% | ||
| | | Monitoring 2023: 100% (U, ReU, Connect, InnoU)<br />Monitoring 5/2024: (U2, ReU2, EGAI) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | '''IND 1.3.b''' Overall assessment score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA | ||
| | | % | ||
| | | QEB Office: UNITA Quality Review Report last approved by the QEB (manual collection; reports available on the Datacloud) | ||
| | | Annual | ||
| | | 79% (1st assessment) | ||
| | | 85% | ||
| Monitoring 2023: 76% (2nd assessment) | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Data collection == | == Data collection == | ||
{{#ask: | |||
[[-Has subobject::DataSrc:UNITA Data/Meta Indic/Indicators]] | |||
[[task_title::{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||
|?indic_description=Indicator Description | |||
|?data_collection=Data Source | |||
|?data_collection_type=Collection Type | |||
|?data_owner=Data Owner | |||
|?frequency | |||
|class=datatable | |||
|format=datatables | |||
|mainlabel=- | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 14:00, 10 April 2025
Task number | 3 |
---|---|
Name | UNITA Quality Assurance |
Strategic Axes | Quality, Impact and Sustainability |
Workpackage | Governance, management and quality |
Objectives[edit | edit source]
Continuous increase of quality through the internal and external independent assessment of all Task activities, and at building the UNITA quality assurance strategy matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University.
- Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices
- Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems
- Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year
- Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy
Inputs & Resources[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
Resources[edit | edit source]
- Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position: Co-leaders Cinzia Bertea UNITO e Vlad Chereches UVT + 24 TT members (Profiles: often from QA offices or QA teams/VR).
- Financial: Budget allocated to the task: 560.460€+260.000€ for “other costs” of the WP1 as a whole, but no specific distribution per task.
- Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools,…): Datacloud, Big Blue Button.
- Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases,…): Datacloud applications; Quality Review Checklists.
Activities & Sub-Tasks[edit | edit source]
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
Indicators[edit | edit source]
These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.
Outputs[edit | edit source]
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
Subtask Outputs[edit | edit source]
Sub Task Outputs Indicate concerned sub task |
Outputs indicator Expected results at the sub-task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
Implementation of UNITA Quality Assurance Plan | D1.3 - UNITA Quality Assurance plan implemented | Milestone document MS14 - First annual monitoring of the QA Plan implementation |
Update of the QA policy for UNITA | Updated QA policy document for UNITA | UNITA QA policy document + annual reports of QA Plan implementation |
Quality assessment of UNITA constellation projects | IND 1.3.a Percentage of quality assessed UNITA Constellation projects (Level: Alliance) Baseline 2022: 40% (UNITA, Re-UNITA) |
|
Score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA | IND 1.3.b Overall assessment score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA in the following domains: Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Risk, Issues & Decisions, Communication, Project Organization, Beneficiary satisfaction (Level: Alliance) Baseline 2022: 79% (1st assessment) |
Outcomes[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
Task Outcomes[edit | edit source]
Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes |
Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
% of quality assessed UNITA constellation projects | Proposal: Evaluating and brief description on the percentage of quality assessed UNITA Constellation projects and the frequency of the Quality reviews | QR Reports approved by the QEB |
Overall assessment score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA | Proposal: Brief presentation on the overall assessment score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA in each domain and followup improvements actions | Last UNITA QR Report approved by the QEB |
MS14 - First annual monitoring of the QA Plan implementation | Proposal: Brief presentation of the QA Plan implementation Monitoring’s results | First annual monitoring document |
Impacts[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
- Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description - T1.3 description - WP1 Objectives
- UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)
Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA | End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA | |
---|---|---|
1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions? | Partners of UNITA | - Other universities the UNITA partners collaborate with (exchange students; visiting professors) - National accreditation agencies |
2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them? | To be defined in interview | Possible impact measures: - Conference proceedings |
Indicators' data sheet[edit | edit source]
Description | Unit of measurement | Source of data | Frequency | Baseline (2022) | Target 2027 | Possible sub indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IND 1.3.a Percentage of quality assessed UNITA Constellation projects | % (list of projects reviewed / total of Constellation projects active at least 6 months) | QEB Office: Quality Review Reports approved by the QEB (manual collection; reports available on the Datacloud) | Semestral or annual | 40% (UNITA, Re-UNITA) | 100% | Monitoring 2023: 100% (U, ReU, Connect, InnoU) Monitoring 5/2024: (U2, ReU2, EGAI) |
IND 1.3.b Overall assessment score of the Quality Review Checklist for UNITA | % | QEB Office: UNITA Quality Review Report last approved by the QEB (manual collection; reports available on the Datacloud) | Annual | 79% (1st assessment) | 85% | Monitoring 2023: 76% (2nd assessment) |