UNITA personalised international learning paths

 Notice: The following sections are missing information: Indicators Sheet and Confirm Indicators.

Task number	1
Name	UNITA personalised international learning paths
Strategic Axes	Education and Pedagogical Innovation
Workpackage	UNITA Lifelong education

Objectives

This Task aims at encouraging the internationalization and personalisation of study paths. Three main outcomes are expected, namely the design of common study paths, the creation of the “UNITA à la carte” model, and of the UNITA label. Based on UNITA first phase (D2.4: 3 replicable models of internationalised curricula) and on the results of the matching event on education that will be held in March 2023, UNITA common learning paths will be designed and launched. A wide variety of shared, personalised, multilingual, inclusive and dynamic study paths will be designed and implemented, thus developing the model of "UNITA à la carte", the mobility window and shared study programmes. The responsibles of degree programmes and Vice-rectors in education will support the development, adoption and implementation of a common UNITA framework for diplomas and personalised international learning paths. As central action within this framework, the UNITA Label will certify particularly internationalized degrees, in line with the EQAF and the criteria pointed out in the pilot call on the European degree label, also complying with the national regulations.

The production of degrees will be supported by Task teams 2.2, 2.4, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.4. The programmes will be included in the UNITA comprehensive course cartography, hosted in the UNITA inter-university digital campus.

Percentage of study programmes with UNITA à la carte activities or with UNITA degree label

• Baseline 2022: n.a.
• Target 2027: 30%

Inputs & Resources

Source documentation:

• UNITA Tasks_Team_List_20231120
• UNITA Budget documents

Resources

• Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position : 31 people. Are UNITA offices supporting this task? YES. We should note that some tasks are saying that they may be spending too much time on UNITA.

First name	Last name	E-mail	Role	Partner Acronym	Function in partner university	Function in UNITA 1.0 (if any)
Sophie	Tapparel	sophie.tapparel@hes-so.ch	Member	HES-SO	Head of HES-SO Master
Olivier	Naef	olivier.naef@hes-so.ch	Member	HES-SO	Head of Engineering & architecture faculty
Carla	Ravasco	c.ravasco@ipg.pt	Member	IPG	English Teacher and Researcher in the field of Education
Mário	Morais	mario.morais@ipg.pt	Member	IPG	Project manager for education
Nuno	Jerónimo	nunoaj@ubi.pt	Member	UBI	Sociology Dep. Professor	WP7 Rural Workshop
Jorge	Madeira	jhsm@ubi.pt	Member	UBI	Academic Services
Raquel	Costa	raquel.craveiro.costa@ubi.pt	Member	UBI	Quality Dep. & U Office	UNITA Officer for WP2, WP5, QEB
Helena	Alves	halves@ubi.pt	Member	UBI	VR Education	WP2 member, WP4 CH Hub UBI Coord.
Carmen	Marchiori	carmen.marchiori@unibs.it	Member	UNIBS	Rector’s delegate for international orientation and double degrees
Monica	Bonfardini	monica.bonfardini@unibs.it	Member	UNIBS	General Director
Alina	Popescu	a.popescu@unitbv.ro	Member	UNITBV	University Registrar
Ileana	Botescu	ileana.botescu@unitbv.ro	Member	UNITBV	Associated Professor, Faculty of Letters
Mihaela	Gheorghe	m.gheorghe@unitbv.ro	Member	UNITBV	Vice Rector for Education
Consuelo	Murtas	consolatrice.murtas@unito.it	Member	UNITO	Internalization Direction member
Marcella	Costa	marcella.costa@unito.it	Co-Leader	UNITO	Vice-Rector for Internailzation of Education	WP1 member
Giovanni	Andriolo	giovanni.andriolo@unito.it, unita.students@unito.it	Member	UNITO	UNITA Office member
Pilar	Sánchez Burriel	pisa@unizar.es	Member	UNIZAR	Academic Vice Manager
Raquel	Ortega Lapiedra	rortega@unizar.es	Member	UNIZAR	Director of the Secretariat for Graduate Studies	WP2 member
Diego	Conde	841424@unizar.es	Member	UNIZAR	Student	Student Assembly member
José Ángel	Castellanos Gómez	vrpola@unizar.es	Member	UNIZAR	Vice Rector for Academic Policy
Roberto	Vallés Lanas	roberto.valles@unavarra.es	Member	UPNA	Education Service Director
Miguel Ángel	Campo Bescos	miguel.campo@unavarra.es	Member	UPNA	Head of Academic Organization
Fabienne	Gaspari	fabienne.gaspari@univ-pau.fr	Member	UPPA	Professor
Natalia	Hochman-Lefèvre	natalia.hochman-lefevre@univ-pau.fr	Member	UPPA	Cross-borders projects Manager
Marx	Chhay	marx.chhay@univ-smb.fr	Co-Leader	USMB	Enseignant chercheur	Chargé de mission UNITA pour l’USMB, coordinateur du WP2 et coordinateur du WP6 d’UNITA
Ingrid	Le Ru	int-competences@univ-smb.fr	Member	USMB	Admin (U Recipes project manager)
Irina	Macsinga	irina.macsinga@e-uvt.ro	Member	UVT	Dean, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology	UNITA WP1 local coordinator
Karla	Lupsan	karla.lupsan@e-uvt.ro	Member	UVT	Vice-dean of the Faculty of Letters, History and Theology
Vlad	Chereches	vlad.chereches@e-uvt.ro	Member	UVT	Director, Department for Quality Management	UNITA QEB member, UNITA WP2 UVT member
Diana	Alexan	diana.alexan@e-uvt.ro	Member	UVT	Referent QMD
Melinda	Dincă	melinda.dinca@e-uvt.ro	Member	UVT

• Financial: Budget allocated to the task:
  • Travel (40%), Accomodation (40%), Subsistence (20%) : 138 063 €
  • Other costs : 82 906 €
• Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools …): UNITA Datacloud, UNITA Virtual Campus, they need good catalogues for track mobilities (BIP, rural, etc.), the app used by different institutions to accept/manage mobilities, Rural Mobility and the local partners agreements, Excel files with the offers, Course catalogues for mobilities, Course catalogues for Rural Mob, BIPS, Each university use app tools, the need applications and tools to work much more easy than now, data base, centralised files, common tools

|Intangible=Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases …):

• Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases …):

Activities & Sub-Tasks

Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)

• Task Description – T3.1 description
• GANTT – T3.1 GANTT

List of activities	Activity title	Activity description	Deadline
1	Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices.	The new partners have been associated with the project's activities since June 2021, resulting in an easier and shorter acquaintance process.	(M1-M2)
2	Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems.	Building on phase one benchmarking by the QEB, by including the new partners' QA systems frameworks. Update and adopt the UNITA Quality Assurance policy to be implemented at partner and alliance level, with quantitative and qualitative indicators fitting the new WP and Tasks structure. Define opportunities of partner Quality Assurance synergies, further developing the common Quality Assurance policy respecting different institutional/regional/national contexts. Together with TTs 1.2 and 5.4, agree on the methodology for the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables, including systematic feedback from students, staff and stakeholders. Update the Quality Assurance plan by drawing a map through a logical table relating Tasks and indicators, defining all the processes to reach the objectives, and building a management quality system with procedure and codification for each process or activity. Train all the Task teams to the quality assurance policy and plan.	(M3-M12)
3	Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year.	Producing a report for the QEB. Support the QEB in the production of the annual report with recommendations for the Governance Board (GB). Monitor the implementation of the corrective actions decided by the GB and evolve the quality assurance requirements and plan accordingly. Repeat evaluations emphasising identified areas of improvement. Evaluate and realize the independent assessment given by an external European Evaluation Agency, accommodating modifications in the interest of improvement. Draw lessons from the implementation of the quality assurance plan integrating best practices based on an inventory, mapping of the main QA processes on teaching, research, and public engagement.	(M13-M48)
4	Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy.	Matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University. Internally disseminate the strategy to all actors and in particular to the Quality Assurance Boards of the partners. Benchmark Quality Assurance strategy and practices with other European Universities by organizing and participating to mutual learning workshops.	(M24-M48)

Indicators

These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.

Outputs

Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)

• Task Description – T3.1 description
• GANTT – T3.1 GANTT
• List of Indicators – UNITA indicators

Primary indicatorsSecondary indicatorsSub-Indicators

These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission.

To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader

To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader

Primary indicators

Indicators gathered from the proposal

• IND 3.1.a – Percentage of study programmes with UNITA à la carte activities or with UNITA degree label (This may already be an outcome indicator).
  Baseline 2022: n.a.(1000)
  Target 2027: 30%(300?)

Secondary indicators

To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader

Task Outputs

Task Outputs Indicate concerned sub task	Sub-Task Outputs	Outputs indicator Expected results at the sub-task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders	Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders
A3.1.1 Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one (M1–M2)		* Is the benchmark available and validated? * Existing common framework with definitions? * Final version of LLL strategy document + Action plan?	Example: Information by task co-leader To be defined: when ... • Meeting 1: presentation from U1 of results related to T3.1 • Meetings with institutions from the same country to tackle practical aspects • Meeting of restitution, identification of potential remaining issues
A3.1.2 Create the “UNITA à la carte” model (M3–M48)		* Definition of what UàlCarte is + current status of the involved concepts and tools (Cartography, CONNECT-UNITA) * Taking into account the result of FUW_ICTU23, analysis of results regarding the UàC initiative * Identify how UàC can be developed/supported for the ICTU23 groups * From FUW_ICTU23, identify additional study programs (not only those aiming to implement BIPs or COIL) that may support the UàC initiative * List of programs offering a possibility of personalization * Design of UàC strategy based on the “personalizability” of study programs: how to collect interest, needs and compatibility among the study programs, regarding UàC? * Specification of the tools related to each UàC mobility activity * Development of tools and procedure related to each initiative
A3.1.3 Introduce the mobility window (MW) in study programmes (M6–M48)		* MW concepts: goals, models of LA, process supporting the dissemination to students and the automatic recognition (EWP?) * Link with 2.4: processes and calendars for Erasmus calls in all Universities * Identification of pilot curricula for testing MW, mainly based on FUW_ICTU23 * Development of procedure for MW-testing period (a.y. 2025–26): tools, calendar, target * Strategy for duplicating MW to new study programs -> ICTU4 (a.y. 2026–27) * Experimentation with E+ mobility campaign and selection process (Testing period a.y. 2025–26) * Follow-up of the mobility experience with MW – perspective of students and professors (Testing period a.y. 2025–26) * Adjust the procedure to duplicate the MW and find other courses to be involved in the MW (a.y. 2026–27) * Implementation of the procedure for MW in Erasmus+ call 2026–27
A3.1.4 Develop and promote a UNITA European label for joint study programmes (M5–M11)		* Define the criteria for the UNITA label. In relation to this, it will be important to decide how these will intersect with the criteria envisaged for the European Degree Label * Specify the process for granting the UNITA label * Output: prepare a guide to explain what is the UNITA label, what are the defining criteria, what are the benefits of getting a label, how to apply for it, etc.
A3.1.5 Design and implement shared UNITA degrees (M11–M48)

Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes	Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders	Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders
	* Number (or percentage) of programs where mobility window is available
What are the benefits of the actions for the alliance?	* Number (or percentage) of degree programs with “UNITA à la carte”
To what extent did the task contribute to achieve WP’s and/or UNITA’s goals?	* Number (or percentage) of degree programs under the UNITA label

Outcomes

Source documentation:

• Task Description – T3.1 description
• GANTT – T3.1 GANTT

Task Outcomes

Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes	Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders	Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders
A3.1.1 Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one (M1–M2)
A3.1.2 Create the “UNITA à la carte” model (M3–M48)
A3.1.3 Introduce the mobility window (MW) in study programmes (M6–M48)
A3.1.4 Develop and promote a UNITA European label for joint study programmes (M5–M11)
A3.1.5 Design and implement shared UNITA degrees (M11–M48)

Impacts

Source documentation:

• Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description - T3.1 description - WP3 Objectives
• UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)

	Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA	End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA
1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions ?	Partners of UNITA To be defined in interview Institution, students (teachers are weak point at the current stage, so not to be listed as for now)	To check with the T5.1 list To be defined in interview
2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them?	To be defined in interview Institution should forward UNITA and international exchange through courses and opportunities. What can a EU university propose (reflect through multilingual paths, etc.)	To be defined in interview

Possible impact indicator(s)

• Number of students using the flexibility window (and possibily monitoring increase over the years)
• Number of sudents obtaing degrees under the UNITA label (and possibily monitoring increase over the years)
• How are the member universities internal structures changed from the UNITA personalised international learning paths?

Indicators' data sheet

Description	Unit of measurement	Source of data	Frequency	Baseline (2022)	Target 2027	Possible sub indicators

Data collection

• Manual collection: -
• Automatic collection: -