UNITA Quality Assurance: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1470807?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FTask1.3%2FT1.3_Task_description.docx Task Description – T1.3 description] | * [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1470807?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FTask1.3%2FT1.3_Task_description.docx Task Description – T1.3 description] | ||
* [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1473670?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FWP1_Gantt_Chart.xlsx GANTT – WP1 GANTT] | * [https://datacloud.univ-unita.eu/index.php/apps/onlyoffice/1473670?filePath=%2F5_Unita_Phase_II%2FUNITA%2FWP1%2FWP1_Gantt_Chart.xlsx GANTT – WP1 GANTT] | ||
= Activities/Sub-Tasks = | = Activities/Sub-Tasks = | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" |
Revision as of 14:50, 3 April 2025
Task number | 3 |
---|---|
Name | UNITA Quality Assurance |
Strategic Axes | Governance, Quality, Impact and Sustainability |
Workpackage | Governance, management and quality |
Objectives
Continuous increase of quality through the internal and external independent assessment of all Task activities, and at building the UNITA quality assurance strategy matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University.
- Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices
- Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems
- Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year
- Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy
Inputs & Resources
Source documentation:
Resources
- Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position: Co-leaders Cinzia Bertea UNITO e Vlad Chereches UVT + 24 TT members (Profiles: often from QA offices or QA teams/VR).
- Financial: Budget allocated to the task: 560.460€+260.000€ for “other costs” of the WP1 as a whole, but no specific distribution per task.
- Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools,…): Datacloud, Big Blue Button.
- Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases,…): Datacloud applications; Quality Review Checklists.
Activities & Sub-Tasks
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
Activities/Sub-Tasks
List of activities | Actions to implement | Deadline |
---|---|---|
A1.3.1 Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices | The new partners have been associated with the projects activities since June 2021, resulting in an easier and shorter acquaintance process. | Dec 2023 |
A1.3.2 Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems | Building on phase one benchmarking by the QEB, by including the new partners’ QA systems frameworks. Update and adopt the UNITA QA policy to be implemented at partner and alliance level, with quantitative and qualitative indicators fitting the new WP and Tasks structure. Define opportunities of partner Quality Assurance synergies, further developing the common Quality Assurance policy respecting different institutional/ regional/national contexts. Together with TTs 1.2 and 5.4, agree on the methodology for the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables, including systematic feedback from students, staff and stakeholders. Update the Quality Assurance plan by drawing a map through a logical table relating Tasks and indicators, defining all the processes to reach the objectives, and building a management quality system with procedure and codification for each process or activity. Train all the Task teams to the quality assurance policy and plan. | Oct 2024 |
A1.3.3 Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year | Producing a report for the QEB. Support the QEB in the production of the annual report with recommendations for the Governance Board (GB). Monitor the implementation of the corrective actions decided by the GB and evolve the quality assurance requirements and plan accordingly. Repeat evaluations emphasising identified areas of improvement. Evaluate and realize the independent assessment given by an external European Evaluation Agency, accommodating modifications in the interest of improvement. Draw lessons from the implementation of the quality assurance plan integrating best practices based on an inventory, mapping of the main QA processes on teaching, research, and public engagement. | Oct 2027 |
A1.3.4 Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy | Matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University. Internally disseminate the strategy to all actors and in particular to the Quality Assurance Boards of the partners. Benchmark Quality Assurance strategy and practices with other European Universities by organizing and participating to mutual learning workshops. | Oct 2027 |
Indicators
These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.
Outputs
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
Primary indicators
Indicators gathered from the proposal
- IND 1.1.a – Number of governance structures fully participated by all ten university full partners.
Baseline 2022: 0
Target 2027: 4 (GB, QEB, SA, MC)
Level: Alliance
Already reached - IND 1.1.b – Number of partners in the Legal Entity
Baseline 2022: 6
Target 2027: 10
Level: Alliance
Nearly done - IND 1.1.c – Number of co-designed long-term strategies for UNITA
Baseline 2022: 1
Target 2027: 12
Level: Alliance
Extracted from deliverables
Secondary indicators
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
- Proposal: Number and brief description on the updates introduced in the governance structures. They have 16-20 strategies already planned (but not long term). They will have to choose 12 as starting points for long term strategies.
Subtask Outputs
Sub Task Outputs Indicate concerned sub task |
Outputs indicator Expected results at the sub-task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
A1.1.2 Update and maintain the governance structures (Governance Board, Student Assembly, Quality and Evaluation Board) | * Updates introduced in the governance structures | * WP meeting minutes? |
A1.1.3 Establish the agenda of the new bodies of the enlarged alliance | ||
A1.1.4 Coordinate the development of the UNITA model for a European University |
Outcomes
Source documentation:
Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes |
Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
List objectives and primary indicators at task level to reach them | * UNITA model for a European University | * From deliverable |
What are the benefits of the actions for the alliance partners? How does the task transform the partners? | * Student Assembly? To ask, evolution of student participation in student elections, if it happens (example). This should be an internal indicator, because we are not sure we want to disclose the results. | * Data from the student elections platform |
To what extent did the task contribute to achieve WP’s and/or UNITA’s goals? | * Monitor participation to governance board (for internal purposes) | * Governance Board minutes |
Impacts
Source documentation:
- Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description - T1.1 description - WP1 Objectives
- UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)
Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA | End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA | |
---|---|---|
1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions ? | * Partners of UNITA * Not only internal partners but also the EU commission and other alliances. Also the community of our member universities. |
To check with the T5.1 list |
2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA ? What are the long term results for them ? |
Indicators' data sheet
Description | Unit of measurement | Source of data | Frequency | Baseline (2022) | Target 2027 | Possible sub indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of governance structures fully participated by all ten university full partners | Number (or percentage) | ? | Once | 0 | 4 (100%) | |
Number of partners in the Legal Entity | Number (or percentage) | ? | Once | 6 | 10 (100%) | |
Number of co-designed long-term strategies for UNITA | Number | ? | Mid-term and project end | 1 | 12 |
Data collection
- Manual collection: -
- Automatic collection: -