 Notice: The following sections are missing information: Indicators Sheet, Data collection.

Task number	1
Name	UNITA sustainable policies for students and staff
Strategic Axes	Communities building
Workpackage	Developing UNITA communities

Objectives

Joint action to establish well developed and flexible student and staff policies at partner and alliance level, to formulate ambitious and reachable well-being, inclusion and equity, career development, organizational innovation and student cooperation.

Establish well developed and flexible student and staff policies aiming at measurable increases in 5 fields:

Student and staff well-being
Inclusion and gender equity
Staff training, career and leadership development within the alliance
Intra- and extra entrepreneurship
Connecting students’ organisations and initiatives.

Inputs & Resources

Source documentation:

Resources

Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position: Co-leaders Joaquín Romero Roldán UPNA & Delia Virga UVT + 28 TT members (Profiles: often from QA offices or QA teams/VR)
Financial: Budget allocated to the task: 42.140€+75.200€ for “other costs” of the WP2 as a whole, but no specific distribution per task.
Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools,…): Datacloud, Big Blue Button.
Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases,…): Datacloud applications; +++

Activities & Sub-Tasks

Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)

List of activities	Activity title	Activity description	Deadline
1	Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices.	The new partners have been associated with the project's activities since June 2021, resulting in an easier and shorter acquaintance process.	(M1-M2)
2	Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems.	Building on phase one benchmarking by the QEB, by including the new partners' QA systems frameworks. Update and adopt the UNITA Quality Assurance policy to be implemented at partner and alliance level, with quantitative and qualitative indicators fitting the new WP and Tasks structure. Define opportunities of partner Quality Assurance synergies, further developing the common Quality Assurance policy respecting different institutional/regional/national contexts. Together with TTs 1.2 and 5.4, agree on the methodology for the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables, including systematic feedback from students, staff and stakeholders. Update the Quality Assurance plan by drawing a map through a logical table relating Tasks and indicators, defining all the processes to reach the objectives, and building a management quality system with procedure and codification for each process or activity. Train all the Task teams to the quality assurance policy and plan.	(M3-M12)
3	Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year.	Producing a report for the QEB. Support the QEB in the production of the annual report with recommendations for the Governance Board (GB). Monitor the implementation of the corrective actions decided by the GB and evolve the quality assurance requirements and plan accordingly. Repeat evaluations emphasising identified areas of improvement. Evaluate and realize the independent assessment given by an external European Evaluation Agency, accommodating modifications in the interest of improvement. Draw lessons from the implementation of the quality assurance plan integrating best practices based on an inventory, mapping of the main QA processes on teaching, research, and public engagement.	(M13-M48)
4	Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy.	Matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University. Internally disseminate the strategy to all actors and in particular to the Quality Assurance Boards of the partners. Benchmark Quality Assurance strategy and practices with other European Universities by organizing and participating to mutual learning workshops.	(M24-M48)

Indicators

These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.

Source documentation:

These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission.

Indicator	Indicator Description	Unit of measurement	Data Source	Frequency	Baseline	Target	Type
a	Number of dissemination events, courses, and focus group meetings on the different domains of the task	Numerical	UNITA Offices	Annual		20	Output

To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader

Indicator Description	Unit of measurement	Data Source	Frequency	Type
Level of satisfaction/person	Numerical	UNITA Offices	Annual	Outcome
Number of common model assumed by UNITA	Numerical	UNITA Offices	Annual	Output
Number of policies assumed from the common model by each university	Numerical	UNITA Offices	Annual	Output
Number of staff beneficiated from each activity/university	Numerical	UNITA Offices	6 months	Output

To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader

Data collection

Indicator Description	Data Source	Collection Type	Data Owner
Level of satisfaction/person	UNITA Offices	Manual	Task 1.2
Number of dissemination events, courses, and focus group meetings on the different domains of the task	UNITA Offices	Manual	Task 1.2
Number of common model assumed by UNITA	UNITA Offices	Manual	Task 1.2
Number of policies assumed from the common model by each university	UNITA Offices	Manual	Task 1.2
Number of staff beneficiated from each activity/university	UNITA Offices	Manual	Task 1.2

Impacts

Source documentation:

Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description - T2.1 description - WP2 Objectives
UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)

	Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA	End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA
1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions ?	Partners of UNITA Academic and administrative staff from each partner’s university Students from each partner’s university	To check with the T5.1 list
2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them ?	At the societal level, if we strengthen UNITA Communities: • Able to transfer more knowledge to society in research, teaching and innovation so the progress will increase • Strengthen European Union • offer of good practices For other universities and alliance • Relevant training for leaders in Academia Gain knowledge in a better inclusive way.	It's the same as an intern in a sense. Better integration and inclusivity for students throughout Europe.
3) To find indicators for impact, they suggested to do a survey/interview, perhaps the same they are thinking of doing now, at the beginning of the project, and see differences at the end of the project	Satisfaction Survey, interviews, checklists	Satisfaction Survey, interviews, checklists