These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission.
UNITA seamless mobility
Notice: The following sections are missing information: Indicators Sheet and Confirm Indicators.
| Task number | 4 |
|---|---|
| Name | UNITA seamless mobility |
| Strategic Axes | Communities building |
| Workpackage | Developing UNITA communities |
Objectives[edit | edit source]
This Task aims at gradually making seamless and embedded mobility both for students and academic and support staff a structural feature at all levels through a series of targeted and measurable joint mobility actions. We will align and evolve strategies to support physical, blended mobility or virtual learning. The Task builds on the achievements of UNITA phase one, aiming at a significant increase of physical, blended, and virtual mobilities within the alliance. Difficulties in phase one were the precarious conditions of IT management tools, the different academic timetables, lack of information, limited financial support and academic recognition. The Task team will work at partner and alliance level to implement and test the mobility actions in a step-by-step approach, supporting mobility in general with a particular emphasis on intra-alliance and rural mobility, working towards a 50% target set for 2030.
- Realise seamless mobility opportunities for students and staff by embedding mobility as a structural feature at all levels of the alliance, with a particular emphasis on intra-alliance and rural mobility.
- Pave the way towards seamless mobility by reducing obstacles and simplifying procedures including automatic recognition.
Inputs & Resources[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
Resources[edit | edit source]
- Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position: Co-leaders Oana Ivan-Horobet UVT and María Villarroya UNIZAR + 41 TT members
- Financial: Budget allocated to the task: 479,400 €
- Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools …): UNITA Datacloud, UNITA Virtual Campus, they need good catalogues for track mobilities (BIP, rural, etc.), the app used by different institutions to accept/manage mobilities, Rural Mobility and the local partners agreements, Excel files with the offers, Course catalogues for mobilities, Course catalogues for Rural Mob, BIPS, Each university use app tools, the need applications and tools to work much more easy than now, data base, centralised files, common tools
|Intangible=Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases …): UNITA Datacloud, UNITA Virtual Campus, communications, monitoring the mobility, measuring satisfaction, not lose information in the process
- Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases …): UNITA Datacloud, UNITA Virtual Campus, communications, monitoring the mobility, measuring satisfaction, not lose information in the process
Activities & Sub-Tasks[edit | edit source]
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
Indicators[edit | edit source]
These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.
Outputs[edit | edit source]
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
Primary indicators[edit | edit source]
Indicators gathered from the proposal
- IND 2.4.a – Average percentage among partners of graduates at bachelor, master and doctorate level who have completed an international mobility within UNITA.
Baseline 2022: 2%
Target 2027: 25%
Level: Alliance - IND 2.4.b – Average percentage among partners of staff engaging in an international mobility within UNITA
Baseline 2022: 2.4%
Target 2027: 5%
Level: Alliance
Secondary indicators[edit | edit source]
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
- Number of participants by level of study (bachelor, master, doctorate…)
- Number of mobilities by type of mobility (physical, blended, virtual, Rural…)
- Number of offers
- Number of places for Rural Mobilities
- Number of BIPs organised for students
- Number of courses offered through virtual mobilities
- Number of participants by type of group (teachers & researchers – teaching/training/attend events, administrative staff – training/attend events)
- Number of mobilities by type of mobility (physical, blended and other events)
- Number of BIPs organised for staff
- Number of staff training/international weeks organised for staff
Subtask Outputs[edit | edit source]
| Sub Task Outputs Indicate concerned sub task |
Outputs indicator Expected results at the sub-task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
|---|---|---|
| A2.4.1 Define an alliance mobility strategy and action plan | - Is the partnership mobility strategy and an action plan defined? In progress |
Report |
| A2.4.2 Encourage and facilitate mobility | - The number of dissemination actions/activities and the channels: email, social media, webpages – regarding the mobilities | Information given by partner universities |
| A2.4.3 Ensure accessible mobility for every student | - If the offer covers every discipline or study fields - If the offer is open to all students |
Information given by partner universities |
| A2.4.4 Enhance the impact on the territories | - Number of offers of UNITA Rural Mobility - Number of local partners - The evaluation of the impact in the territory - Satisfaction barometer of activity - Evaluation on the territories |
Report |
| A2.4.5 Track careers after mobilities | - Number of student participants in mobilities that get a job “Career track” working-group – not yet defined and not yet launched |
Information given by partner universities |
Outcomes[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
Task Outcomes[edit | edit source]
| Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes |
Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
|---|---|---|
| What are the benefits of the actions for the alliance partners? How does the task transform the partners? | * Number of participants * Level of satisfaction of participants in mobilities |
UNITA offices, UNITA website, universities |
| To what extent did the task contribute to achieve WP’s and/or UNITA’s goals? | * The mobility is the tool to be in contact * It helps to achieve all the goals * Different types/offers of mobilities |
UNITA offices, UNITA website, universities |
Impacts[edit | edit source]
Source documentation:
- Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description - T2.4 description - WP2 Objectives
- UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)
| Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA | End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA | |
|---|---|---|
| 1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions ? | Partners of UNITA: All the students and all the staff GEMINAE partners |
The funders of Erasmus+ and others (public administrations and local partners) |
| 2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them? | It helps to reinforce EU citizenship, to enhance UNITA community, to develop more consistent curricula for students, enhance the quality of the careers of staff (more internationalisation), and to improve the professional network of individuals within mobilities. | The impact in the territories, especially with rural mobilities (impacts in depopulated territories) |
Indicators' data sheet[edit | edit source]
| Description | Unit of measurement | Source of data | Frequency | Baseline (2022) | Target 2027 | Possible sub indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data collection[edit | edit source]
Indicators Visualization[edit | edit source]
Description[edit | edit source]
The first graph illustrates student mobility by categorizing events into various types such as BIP-student mobility for studies, SMS-student mobility for studies, and SMT-student mobility for traineeship. It further breaks down participation by degree level—Bachelor, Master, Doctorate—and includes student assembly membership. In contrast, the second graph focuses on academic mobility, organizing events like Governance Board meeting, Matching Event (Research, Education etc), and staff mobility for teaching and training. Participation is broken down by roles such as Staff academic, Staff administrative, Researcher, and Not defined. Together, these visualizations provide a clear comparative view of how students and academics engage in different mobility activities within the institution.