These indicators have been chosen and agree during the Phase 2 proposal made to the European Commission.
UNITA Inter-University Digital Campus
Notice: The following sections are missing information: Indicators Sheet.
Task number | 4 |
---|---|
Name | UNITA Inter-University Digital Campus |
Strategic Axes | Education and Pedagogical Innovation |
Workpackage | UNITA Lifelong education |
Objectives
- Establish user-friendly, interactive environment and information system accessible to students, researchers and staff, but also to lifelong learners and territorial actors in order to create a system that exchanges data in an easy-to-use manner across partners and alliance actors
- Providing and maintaining the infrastructure, transparency and digital in relationship with all the tasks e.g. voting tools, catalogues and cartographies, seamless mobility, from registration to certification support tools, research hubs cartography and Open data, catalogue of shared infrastructure and knowledge, connected classrooms
- Integrate the new partners contributions (through the IT department of the UNITA)
- Development of a multi-lingual, multi-site and multi-modal integrated lifelong learning environment and academic information system serving learners, staff and stakeholders from registration to certification with online access to materials, connected classrooms, our comprehensive course cartography, projects and mobility services
Inputs & Resources
Source documentation:
Resources
- Human Resources: List of staff on the task, roles and position: 39 people involved in the task. Carlos Brigas and Vlad Petcu are the co-leaders. Rectors, vice-rectors, academics, administrative staff and student representatives are present.
- Financial: Budget allocated to the task: a general budget for WP3 is defined (731.820€+483.986€), within the following specific distribution per task 3.4., as follows: 5.580€+104.000€ (total 3.4).
- Materials: Type of materials required (computers, software, scientific tools): Datacloud, Big Blue Button, others? To be completed?
- Intangible: Type of intangible materials (communication tools, data bases,…):
Activities & Sub-Tasks
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
List of activities | Activity title | Activity description | Deadline |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Introduce the new partners to the achievements and lessons learned from phase one and to Quality Assurance practices. | The new partners have been associated with the project's activities since June 2021, resulting in an easier and shorter acquaintance process. | (M1-M2) |
2 | Update the general synoptic assessment of partner Quality Assurance systems. | Building on phase one benchmarking by the QEB, by including the new partners' QA systems frameworks. Update and adopt the UNITA Quality Assurance policy to be implemented at partner and alliance level, with quantitative and qualitative indicators fitting the new WP and Tasks structure. Define opportunities of partner Quality Assurance synergies, further developing the common Quality Assurance policy respecting different institutional/regional/national contexts. Together with TTs 1.2 and 5.4, agree on the methodology for the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables, including systematic feedback from students, staff and stakeholders. Update the Quality Assurance plan by drawing a map through a logical table relating Tasks and indicators, defining all the processes to reach the objectives, and building a management quality system with procedure and codification for each process or activity. Train all the Task teams to the quality assurance policy and plan. | (M3-M12) |
3 | Implement and test the evaluation of progress, processes, cost-efficiency, and deliverables of the first year. | Producing a report for the QEB. Support the QEB in the production of the annual report with recommendations for the Governance Board (GB). Monitor the implementation of the corrective actions decided by the GB and evolve the quality assurance requirements and plan accordingly. Repeat evaluations emphasising identified areas of improvement. Evaluate and realize the independent assessment given by an external European Evaluation Agency, accommodating modifications in the interest of improvement. Draw lessons from the implementation of the quality assurance plan integrating best practices based on an inventory, mapping of the main QA processes on teaching, research, and public engagement. | (M13-M48) |
4 | Co-develop together with TT1.1 and disseminate the UNITA Quality Assurance strategy. | Matching with the ambition of developing a model of European University. Internally disseminate the strategy to all actors and in particular to the Quality Assurance Boards of the partners. Benchmark Quality Assurance strategy and practices with other European Universities by organizing and participating to mutual learning workshops. | (M24-M48) |
Indicators
These indicators have been gathered from the different source (list below) and have been gathered from interviews driven by Task 5.4 UNITA impact observatory.
Outputs
Source documentation: In each WP folder, document entitled “WPx_full_description)
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
To be defined by T5.4 members previously to interviews and to be proposed to task co leader
Subtask Outputs
Sub Task Outputs Indicate concerned sub task |
Outputs indicator Expected results at the sub-task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
A3.4.1 Set up the UNITA inter-university digital campus | - Have all the specifications that all task teams consider necessary for the digital campus compiled. | Meetings with the other task teams |
A3.4.2 Set the specifications of the inter-university digital campus | - Have all the specifications that all task teams, and other users such as potential students, and other stakeholders, find necessary for the digital campus compiled. | Surveys Research cartography Analysis of other platforms |
A3.4.3 Implement and test the UNITA inter-university digital campus in a continuous monitoring and follow-up approach | - Having a continuously improving platform based on improving the services available and their functionalities. | Opinion on users about the services available Technical tests to verify the operability and interoperability Feedback collected from previous versions of the platform |
Outcomes
Source documentation:
Task Outcomes
Task Outcomes Identify the outcomes |
Outcomes indicator Expected results at the task level / To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
Source of data To be verified in interview with task co-leaders |
---|---|---|
What are the benefits of the actions for the alliance partners? How does the task transform the partners? | * A tool that will allow you to complement the work of all other tasks since they will all have at some point a connection with what the digital campus will be. | The work carried out in all tasks |
To what extent did the task contribute to achieve WP’s and/or UNITA’s goals? | * With the digital campus tool developed, the objective of disseminating information, and the connection between the various institutions that make up UNITA will be stronger. * It will allow achieving the objectives of other WPs since they will be able to use the digital campus for their subtasks, leading this to help achieve UNITA's objectives. |
With the other task teams and with the usability of the digital campus always working to improve what has already been developed. |
Impacts
Source documentation:
- Task and WP long-term objectives Task Description – T3.4 description - WP3 Objectives
- UNITA Mission Statement (from Grant Agreement)
Users / Beneficiaries Intern to UNITA | End-Users / Beneficiaries extern to UNITA | |
---|---|---|
1) Who are the stakeholders benefiting of the task’s actions? | * Partners of UNITA * The other task teams * The institutions that compose the UNITA alliance * Teachers and students |
* To check with the T5.1 list * Microcredentials implementation will benefit UNITA’s external people |
2) To what extent has the local/international society changed as a result of outcomes compared to before UNITA? What are the long term results for them? | * The collaboration and sharing among all the UNITA community through the digital campus | * The participation of external UNITA people in the digital campus |
Indicators' data sheet
Description | Unit of measurement | Source of data | Frequency | Baseline (2022) | Target 2027 | Possible sub indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|